经典社会学理论与措施阅读清单

来源：文献肃清计划

一、理论是什么？为什么要阅读经典？

杰弗里·亚历山大，2008，《科学思想中的理论逻辑》，见《社会学的理论逻辑：实证主义、预设与当前的争论》，于晓、唐省杰、蒋和明译，北京：商务印书馆。

杰弗里·亚历山大，2008，《经典文本的中心位置》，《社会学基础文献选读》，冯钢编选，杭州：浙江大学出版社。

Alexander, Jeffrey C.2001.“Canons, Discourses, and Research Programs: Plurality, Progress and Competition in Classical, Modern and Contemporary Sociology.” In Alexander(eds.). Mainstream and Critical Social Theory: Classical, Modern and Contemporary , London: Sage.

汉斯·约阿斯、沃尔夫冈·克诺伯，2021，《什么是理论？》，见《社会理论二十讲》，郑作彧译，上海：上海人民出版社。

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. “The Chaos of Disciplines.” In Chaos of Discipline . Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Abend, Gabriel. 2008. “The Meaning of ‘Theory’.” Sociological Theory 26:173—199.

Selg, Peeter. 2013. “The Politics of Theory and the Constitution of Meaning.” Sociological Theory 31 (1): 1–23.

选读：

Turner, Stephen P. 1983. “Contextualism and the Interpretation of the Classical Sociological Texts.” Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture, Past and Present 4: 273-291.

Stinchcombe,Arthur L. 1982. “Should Sociologists Forget their Mothers and their Fathers?” American Sociologist 17: 2-11.

Connell,R. W. 1997. “Why Is Classical Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology 102: 1511-1557.

Burawoy, Michael. 2021. “Why is classical theory classical? Theorizing the canon and canonizing Du Bois.” Journal of Classical Sociology 21(3-4):245-259.

Isaac Ariail Reed and Mayer N. Zald, 2014,“The Unsettlement of Communities of Inquiry,” In Richard Swedberg, ed.Theorizing in the Social Sciences , Stanford University Press.

Reed, Isaac and Jeffrey Alexander. 2009. “Social Science as Reading and Performance: A Cultural-Sociological Understanding of Epistemology”.European Journal of Social Theory 12(1): 21- 41.

二、理论如何展开？科学哲学基础：逻辑实证主义与波普尔

萨米尔·奥卡沙，2013，《科学哲学》，韩广忠，南京：译林出版社。

陈瑞麟，2010，《否证与假说的检验》，见《科学哲学：理论与历史》，台北：群学出版社。

Friedman, Milton. 1968. “The Methodology of Positive Economies.” Pp 508-529 In May Brodbeck(eds). Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. NY:Macmillan.

Hempel,Carl. 1942. “The Function of General Laws in History”.Journal of Philosophy 39 (2): 35-48.

Fetzer, James, “Carl Hempel”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.),

卡尔·波普尔，2019，《科学：猜测和反驳》，见《科学哲学：有一种追问没有止境》，江晓原主编，上海：上海教育出版社。

Thornton, Stephen, “Karl Popper”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.),

Creath, Richard, “Logical Empiricism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.),

选读：

陈瑞麟，2010，《科学哲学：理论与历史》，台北：群学出版社。

威廉·A.戈顿，2018，《卡尔·波普尔与社会科学》，殷杰、马健译，北京: 科学出版社。

威廉姆·奥斯维特，2018，《新社会科学哲学：真实论、解释学和批判理论》，殷杰、张冀峰、蒋鹏慧译，北京: 科学出版社。

Halfpenny, Peter. 2014. Positivism and Sociology: Explaining Social Life. Routledge.

三、理论如何展开？科学哲学基础

吴以义，2013，《科学反动的历史剖析：库恩与他的理论》，上海：复旦大学出版社。

Bird, Alexander, “Thomas Kuhn”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/thomas-kuhn/>.

托马斯·库恩，2022，《科学反动的结构》，张卜天译，北京：北京大学出版社。

托马斯·库恩，2012，《结构之后的路》，邱慧译，北京：北京大学出版社。

托马斯·库恩，2004，《必要的张力：科学研讨的传统和创新》、《对范式的再思索》，《发现的逻辑还是研讨的心理学》，见《必要的张力：科学的传统和改造论文选》，范岱年、纪树立译， 北京：北京大学出版社。

迈克尔·弗里德曼，2013，《库恩和逻辑阅历主义》，见托马斯·尼科尔编，《托马斯·库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。

选读：

托马斯·库恩，2020，《哥白尼反动：西方思想展开中的行星天文学》，吴国盛、张东林、李立译，北京：北京大学出版社。

托马斯·库恩，2004，《必要的张力：科学的传统和改造论文选》，范岱年、纪树立译， 北京：北京大学出版社。

托马斯·尼科尔斯编，2013，《托马斯·库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。

加里·古廷，2013，《托马斯·库恩和法国科学哲学》，见托马斯·尼科尔斯编，《托马斯·库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。

米歇尔·比特博尔、让·伽永，2011，《法国认识论：1830-1970》，郑天喆、莫伟民译，北京：商务印书馆。

加斯东·巴什拉，2022，《科学肉体的构成》，钱培鑫译，上海: 东方出版中心。

四、理论如何展开？科学哲学基础：拉卡托斯与法伊尔阿本德

伊姆雷·拉卡托斯，2005，《科学研讨纲要措施论》，兰征译，上海：上海译文出版社。

约翰·沃勒尔，2013《常规科学和教条主义，范式和进步：库恩“对”波普尔、拉卡托斯》，见托马斯·尼科尔编，《托马斯·库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。

保罗·法伊尔阿本德，2007，《反对措施》，周昌忠译，上海: 上海译文出版社。

Preston, John, “Paul Feyerabend”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),

Baghramian, Maria and J. Adam Carter, “Relativism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

五、科学社会学的视角

Goldman, Alvin and Cailin O’Connor, "Social Epistemology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

赵万里，2002，《科学的社会建构: 科学学问社会学的理论与理论》，天津：天津人民出版社。

迈克尔·马尔凯，2001，《科学与学问社会学》，林聚任译，北京：东方出版社。

史蒂文·夏平、西蒙·谢弗，《利维坦与空气泵：霍布斯、玻意耳与实验生活》，蔡佩君、区立远译，上海：上海人民出版社。

大卫·布鲁尔，2014，《学问和社会意象》，霍桂恒译，北京: 中国人民大学出版社。

Bloor,David.1999. “‘Anti-Latour’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1): 81-112.

Latour,Bruno. 1999. “‘For Bloor and Beyond – A Reply to David Bloor’s Anti-Latour’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1):113-129.

D.布鲁尔，2008,《反拉图尔论》，张敦敏译，《世界哲学》，第4期。

B.拉图尔，2008，《回答D·布鲁尔的<反拉图尔论>》，张敦敏译，《世界哲学》，第4期。

大卫·布鲁尔，2014，《学问和社会意象》，霍桂恒译，北京: 中国人民大学出版社。

布鲁诺·拉图尔，2005，《科学在行动：怎样在社会中跟随科学家和工程师》，刘文旋、郑开译，北京：东方出版社。

布鲁诺·拉图，2016，《巴斯德的实验室：细菌的战争与战争》，伍启鸿、陈荣泰译，台北：群学。

布鲁诺·拉图尔，2022，《我们从未现代过：对称性人类学论集》，刘鹏、安涅思译，上海: 上海文艺出版社。

选读：

Knorr Cetina, Karin.1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press.

Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno.2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press

六、社会科学理论如何展开？帕森斯和默顿

罗伯特·K. 默顿，2008,《论社会学的中层理论》、《阅历研讨对社会学理论的影响》，见《社会理论和社会结构》，唐少杰、齐心等译，南京：译林出版社。

塔尔科特·帕森斯，2012，《序文》、《绪论》，见《社会行动的结构》，张明德、夏遇南、彭刚译，南京：译林出版社。

吉利斯，2014，《迪昂论题与蒯因论题》，见《当代哲学经典：科学哲学卷》，北京：北京师范大学出版社。

Kemp, Stephen. 2017.“Transformational Fallibilism and the Development of Understanding.” Social Epistemology 31(2):192–209.

Lieberson, Stanley and Freda B. Lynn 2002. “Barking Up the Wrong Branch: Scientific Alternatives to the Current Model of Sociological Science.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 1-19.

Fuhse, Jan A. 2022. “How Can Theories Represent Social Phenomena?”Sociology Theory 40(2)：99-123.

选读：

Stinchcombe, Arthur L.1987. Constructing Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 2005,The Logic of Social Research . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Arthur L. Stinchcombe，2012，《社会科学研讨的逻辑》，谢明珊、徐筱琦译，新北：韦伯文化出版。

Stinchcombe, Arthur L.1987. Constructing Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

阿瑟·斯汀奇库姆，《社会史的理论措施》，王东宇译，待出版。

七、社会科学理论如何展开？从扎根理论到拓展个案法再到溯因剖析

Corbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13(1):3-21.

Charmaz, Kathy. 2003. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In NormanK. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln(eds.) Strategies of qualitative inquiry . Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

麦克·布洛维，2007，《拓展个案法》，见麦克·布洛维，《公共社会学》，沈原译，北京: 社会科学文献出版社。

Burawoy, Michael. 2000. “Reaching for the Global.” Pp1-39. In Michael. Burawoy et al., Global Ethnography . Berkeley: University of California Press.

米切尔·邓奈尔，2019，《附录：研讨措施陈说》，见《人行道王国》，马景超、刘冉、王一凡译，上海: 华东师范大学出版社。

Tavory, Iddo and Stefan Timmermans. 2009.“Two Cases of Ethnography: Case, Narrative and Theory in Grounded Theory and the Extended Case Method.”Ethnograph y 10(3): 243-263.

Timmermans, Stefan, Iddo Tavory.2012. ”Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. “Social Theory 30(3):167-186.

Swedberg,Richard. 2012. “Theorizing in sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery.” Theory and Society 41(1):1-40.

选读：

Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research . Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.

Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory . Sage

凯西·卡麦兹，2009，《建构扎根理论：质性研讨理论指南》，边国英译，重庆: 重庆大学出版社。

徐淑英、任兵、吕力主编，2016，《管理理论构建论文集》，北京：北京大学出版社。

Burawoy, Michael.2009. The Extended Case Method:Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Tavory, Iddo and Stefan Timmermans. 2014.Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research . University of Chicago Press.

Timmermans, Stefan andIddo Tavory.2022. Data Analysisin Qualitative Research: Theorizing with AbductiveAnalysis . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

八、社会科学理论如何展开？案例与模型

托马斯·尼科尔斯，2013，《常规科学：从逻辑到基于案例和基于模型的推理》，见托马斯·尼科尔编，《托马斯·库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。

Emigh, Rebecca Jean.1997. “The Power of Negative Thinking: The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory.”Theory and Society 26(5 ): 649–84.

Vaughan, Diane. 1992. “Theory Elaboration: The Heuristics of Case Analysis.” Pp. 173-202 In Ragin, Charles C., and Howard Saul Becker(eds.) What is a Case?:Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry . Cambridge university press.

Vaughan, Diane. 2014.“Analogy, Cases, and Comparative Social Organization. ” Pp. 61-84.In R. Swedberg (eds.) Theorizing in social science: The context of discovery . Stanford University Press.

Desmond, Matthew. 2014. “Relational Ethnography.”Theory and Society 43(5):547–79

Burawoy, Michael. 2017. “On Desmond: The Limits of Spontaneous Sociology.”Theory and Society 46(4):261–84.

Gorski, Philip S. 2004. “The Poverty of Deductivism: A Constructive Realist Model of Sociological Explanation.” Sociological Methodology 34(1): 1-33.

Steinmetz G. 2004. “ Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and ‘Small N’s’ in Sociology. ”Sociological Theory 22(3):371-400.

Lichterman, Paul and Isaac Ariail Reed. 2015. “Theory and Contrastive Explanation in Ethnography.”Sociological Methods & Research 44(4):585–635.

Abend, Gabriel. 2022.“Making Things Possible”, Sociological Methods & Research 51(1): 68–107.

吉尔，2014，《科学的认知进路》，见《当代哲学经典：科学哲学卷》，北京：北京师范大学出版社。

Frigg, Roman and Stephan Hartmann, "Models in Science", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

选读：

马修·德斯蒙德，2022,《扫地出门：美国城市的贫穷与暴利》，胡谆、郑焕升译，太原：山西教育出版社。

玛丽·S·摩根，2021，《模型中的世界》，梁双陆、刘燕译，北京: 社会科学文献出版社。

唐世平，2021，《观念 行动 结果：社会科学措施新论》，天津：天津人民出版社。

George, Alexander and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences . Cambridge: MIT Press.

Abramson, Corey M., and Neil Gong, eds. 2020. Beyond the Case: the Logics and Practices of Comparative Ethnography . Oxford University Press.

九、回到经典：《新教伦理与资本主义肉体》韦伯的行动理论

马克斯·韦伯，2018，《新教伦理与资本主义肉体》，阎克文译，上海: 上海人民出版社。

Weber，Max.2002.The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism . Penguin.

Weber，Max.2011.The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism . Oxford University Press.

马克斯·韦伯，2021，《宗教社会学 宗教与世界》，康乐、简惠美译，上海三联书店，选读。

马克斯·韦伯，2021，《社会科学的基本概念 经济行动与社会团体》，康乐、简惠美译，上海：上海三联书店,选读。

杰弗里·亚历山大，2005，《方式意志论与实质意志论》，见《二十世纪西方社会理论文选：社会理论的开端和终结》，渠东、汲喆译，上海：上海三联书店。

斯蒂芬·卡尔博格，2020，《韦伯的比较历史社会学今探》，张翼飞、殷亚迪译，上海：上海人民出版社。

Turner, Stephen P. 1983. “Weber on Action.” American Sociological Review 48: 506-519

Campbell.Colin. 1996 “On the Concept of Motive in Sociology.” Sociology 30 (1): 101-114.

—— 2006.“Do Today’s Sociologists Really Appreciate Weber’s essay The Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism?” Sociological Review 54 (2) :207-223.

——2009.“Distinguishing the Power of Agency from Agentic Power: A Note on Weber and the ‘Black Box’of Personal Agency”Sociological Theory 27 (4): 407-418.

Biernacki, Richard. 2005. “The Action Turn? Comparative-Historical Inquiry beyond the Classical Models of Conduct.” Pp. 75-91 In Julia Adams, Elisabeth S. Clemens and Ann Shola Orloff (eds.), Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham: Duke University Press.

选读：

Lash Scott andWhimster Sam(eds.), Max Weber：Rationality and Modernity. London: Allen & Unwin.

十、行动理论：从帕森斯到现象学社会学

汉斯·约阿斯、沃尔夫冈·克诺伯，2021，《社会理论二十讲》，郑作彧译，上海：上海人民出版社，2-4、7讲。

杰西·洛佩兹、约翰·斯科特，2007，《制度结构》，见《社会结构》，允春喜译，吉林: 吉林人民出版社。

Parsons, Talcott. 1938, “The Role of Ideas in Social Action.” American Sociological Review 3:652–64.

Parsons, Talcott. 1972, “Culture and Social System Revisited.” Social Science Quarterly 53(2):253-266.

Barber, Michael, “Alfred Schutz”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

许茨，2017，《社会世界的意义建构：了解的社会学引论》，霍桂恒译，北京：北京师范大学出版社。

舒茨,阿尔弗雷德·2012，《社会世界的意义构成》，游淙祺译，北京：商务印书馆。

克劳斯·黑尔德，2016，《导言》，见《生活世界现象学》，埃德蒙德·胡塞尔著、克劳斯·黑尔德，《生活世界现象学》，倪梁康、张廷国译，上海：上海译文出版社。

彼得·L. 伯格、托马斯·卢克曼，2019，《理想的社会建构：学问社会学论纲》，吴肃然译，北京大学出版社。

Heiskala, Risto.2011.“The Meaning of Meaning in Sociology. The Achievements and Shortcomings of Alfred Schutz’s Phenomenological Sociology. ”Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41(3):231-246

Garfinkel, Harold. 1964. “Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities.” Social Problems11(3): 225-250.

Garfinkel, Harold.1984. “What is Ethnomethodology” Pp1-34. In Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press

选读

赵立玮，2018，《规范与自由：帕森斯社会理论研讨》，商务印书馆。

Neil Gross，2007，“Pragmatism, Phenomenology, and Twentieth-Century American Sociology”，183-224，In Craig Calhoun (ed.), Sociology in America: A History ，University Of Chicago Press.

Rawls, Anne Warfieldand Turowetz, Jason. 2019. “Discovering Culture in Interaction: Solving Problems in Cultural Sociology by Recovering the Interactional Side of Parsons’ Conception of Culture”. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 9:293–320.

Rawls, Anne Warfield.2009.“An essay on two conceptions of social order: constitutive orders of action, objects and identities vs aggregated orders of individual action. ”Journal of Classical Sociology 9(4):500-520.

Rawls, Anne Warfield.2011.“Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch:Constitutive Orders of Sensemaking. ”Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 41(4):396-418.

King, Anthony. 2009, “Overcoming Structure and Agency: Talcott Parsons, Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Theory of Social Action.” Journal of Classical Sociology , 9(2):260–288.

十一、行动理论：符号互动论

赫伯特·布鲁默，2005,《论符号互动论的措施论》，霍桂桓译，见《二十世纪西方社会理论文选 II：社会理论的诸理论》，苏国勋、刘小枫编，上海：上海三联书店。

Blumer, Herbert. 1986. “The Methodological Position of Symbolic Interactionism” and “What is Wrong with Social Theory” Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (pp. 1-60;140-152). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

欧文·戈夫曼，2022，《日常生活中的自我呈现》，冯钢译，北京: 北京大学出版社

Goffman, Erving. 1974. “Introduction” and “The Anchoring of Activity”, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (pp. 1-16; 247-300). New York: Harper Colophon.

Goffman, Erving.1983.“The Interaction Order. American Sociological Association 1982 Presidential Address. ”American Sociological Review 48:1-17.

Tavory, Iddo. 2016. “Interactionism: Self and Meaning as Process.” Pp. 85-98 In Seth Abrutyn (ed.) Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory . Springer.

Eliasoph, Nina and Lichterman, Paul. 2003.“ Culture in interaction.”American Journal of Sociology 108(4):735-794.

Fine, Gary Alan. 1979. “Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little League Baseball Teams.” American Sociological Review 44: 733-745.

Fine, Gary Alan. 1992. “The Culture of Production: Aesthetic Choices and Constraints in Culinary Work.” American Journal of Sociology 97(5):1268–94.

Fine, Gary Alan. 1993.“Ten Lies of Ethnography.”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(3):267- 94.

Fine, Gary Alan. 2003. “Crafting Authenticity: The Validation of Identity in Self-Taught Art.” Theory and Society 32(2):153–180.

Fine, Gary Alan. 2010. “The Sociology of the Local: Action and its Publics.”Sociological Theory 28(4), 355-376.

Fine,Gary Alan and Iddo Tavory. 2019. “Interactionism in the Twenty-First Century: On Being-in-a-Meaningful-World.” Symbolic Interaction 42(3): 457-467.

Tavory, Iddo and Gary Alan Fine. 2020. “Disruption and the Theory of the Interaction Order.” Theory and Society 49(3): 365-385.

选读

Turner, Jonathan H. 1988. A Theory of Social Interaction. Stanford University Press

Griswold, Wendy. 2008. Cultures and Societies in a Changing World . Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

欧文·戈夫曼，2022,《污名：受损身份管理札记》，宋立宏译，北京: 商务印书馆。

盖瑞·阿兰·法恩，2018，《日常天才：自学艺术和本真性文化》， 卢文超、王夏歌译，南京：译林出版社

理查德·A. 彼得森，2017，理查德·A. 彼得森，《发明乡村音乐：本真性之制造》，卢文超译，南京：译林出版社。

戴维·A.卡普，2022，《诉说忧伤：抑郁症的社会学剖析》，幸君珺、萧易忻译，上海：上海教育出版社。

王晴锋，2019，《欧文·戈夫曼与情境互动论》，北京：社会科学文献出版社。

十二、行动理论：米德

乔治·H. 米德，2018，《心灵、自我与社会》，赵月瑟译，上海：上海译文出版社。

乔治·赫伯特·米德，2014，《心灵、自我和社会》，霍桂桓译，南京：译林出版社。

Mead, George Herbert. 2015. Mind, Self and Society: The Definitive Edition. edited by D. R. Huebner, J. Hans, and C. W. Morris. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.

Blumer, Herbert. 1966. “Sociological Implications of the Thought of George Herbert Mead.”American Journal of Sociology , 71(5): 535-544.

Hans Joas. 1997. “George Herbert Mead and the Renaissance of American Pragmatism” In Camic, Charles ed，Reclaiming the Sociological Classics ，Malden:Blackwell Pub

Joas, Hans. 2000.“The emergence of the new: Mead's theory and its contemporary potential.” In G. Ritzer & B. Smart (eds.), Handbook of social theory (pp. 89-99). London: Sage

Callero, Peter. L. 2003. The Sociology of the Self . Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1):115–133.

Somers, Margaret R. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational andNetwork Approach.”Theory and Society 23(5): 605-49.

Aboulafia, Mitchell. “George Herbert Mead”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

选读

Joas, Hans. 1997. G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought , The MIT Press

Huebner, Daniel R. 2014. Becoming Mead: The Social Process of Academic Knowledge . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baldwin,John D. 1986. George Herbert Mead: A Unifying Theory for Sociology ,Sage Publishing Co.

十三、行动理论:亚历山大

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988.Action and its environments: Toward a new synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1990.“Analytic debates: Understanding the relative autonomy of culture.” Pp1-27 In Alexander, J. C. and Seidman, S(eds.).Culture and Society: Contemporary Debates.,New York:Cambridge University Press.

Alexander, Jeffrey C and Philip Smith. 2005. “The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics.” Pp. 11-26 In The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology .

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. “Introduction: Symbolic Action in Theory and Practice: The Cultural Pragmatics of Symbolic Action.” In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, and J. Mast(eds.).Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics and Ritual . Cambridge University Press.

Alexander, Jeffrey and Philip Smith. 2010. “The Strong Program: Origins, Achievements, Prospects” in Hall, J., Grindstaff, L., & Lo, M. (eds.)Handbook of Cultural Sociology . London:Routledge(Pp. 13-24).

杰弗里·亚历山大，2015，《社会表演理论：在仪式和战略之间树立文化语用学模型》，侯园园译，《社会》第3-4期。

十四、行动理论，新适用主义：行动的发明性

汉斯·约阿斯、沃尔夫冈·克诺伯，2021，《新适用主义》，见《社会理论二十讲》，郑作彧译，上海：上海人民出版社。

Joas, Hans and Jens Beckert，2001，“Action Theory.”In Jonathan H. Turner (eds.), Handbook of Sociological Theory ( Pp269–285). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Camic, Charles. 1998. “Reconstructing the Theory of Action.”Sociological Theory 16(3):283–291.

McGowan,John.1998.“Toward a Pragmatist Theory of Action.”Sociological Theory 16(3):292–297.

Dalton, Benjamin.2004.“ Creativity, Habit, and the Social Products of Creative Action: Revising Joas, Incorporating Bourdieu. ”Sociological Theory , 22(4):603-622

Whitford, Josh. 2002.“Pragmatism and the untenable dualism of means and ends: Why rational choice theory does not deserve paradigmatic privilege. ”Theory and Society 31(3):325-363.

Swidler, Ann. 1986，“Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51:273-286

安·斯维德勒，2022，《行动中的文化：意味与战略》，见周怡等编译《文化社会学：经典与前沿》，北京：北京大学出版社。

Swidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of love: How culture matters . University of Chicago Press

Vaisey, Stephen. 2008. “Socrates, skinner, and aristotle: Three ways of thinking about culture in action.” Sociological Forum 23:603–613

Swidler, Ann. 2008. “ Comment on stephen vaisey’s ‘socrates, skinner, and aristotle: Three ways of thinking about culture in action. “Sociological Forum 23:614–618.

选读：

约翰·杜威，2012，《达尔文主义对哲学的影响》、《适用主义所说的“理论的”是什么意义》、《真实具有理论特征吗》，见《杜威全集·中期著作（1899-1924）·第四卷（1907-1909）》，陈亚军、姬志闯译，上海：华东师范大学出版社。

约翰·杜威，2012，《杜威全集·中期著作（1899-1924）·第十四卷（1922）》，罗跃军译，上海：华东师范大学出版社。

Gross, Neil., Isaac Ariail Reed and Christopher Winship(eds.) 2022.The New Pragmatist Sociology: Inquiry, Agency, and Democracy. Columbia University Press.

Legg, Catherine and Christopher Hookway, “Pragmatism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

Hildebrand, David, “John Dewey”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

十五、行动理论，新适用主义：时间性

乔治·赫伯特·米德，2003，《往常的哲学》，李猛译，上海：上海人民出版社。

安德鲁·阿伯特，2021，《结果的概念》，见《过程社会学》，周忆粟译，北京：北京师范大学出版社。

Joas, Hans.1997.G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. The MIT Press，Ch8.

Hitlin.Sand Glen H. Elder Jr. 2007.“Time, Self, and the Curiously Abstract Concept of Agency.” Sociological Theory 25(2):170-191.

Beckert, Jens. 2013. “Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations in the Economy.” Theory and Society 42(3): 219-40

Tavory, Iddoand Nina Eliasoph. 2013.“Coordinating Futures: Toward a Theory of Anticipation.” American Journal of Sociology 118(4): 908-942.

选读

Abbott, Andrew.2001.Time Matters: On Theory and Method.Chicago:University of Chicago.Press

Beckert, Jens.2016.Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2016.

Hayes, Adam. S. 2020.“The Behavioral Economics of Pierre Bourdieu." Sociological Theory 38(1):16–35

十六、行动理论，结构主义与适用主义（1）

查尔斯·皮尔士，2007，《信心的确定》、《如何使我们的观念分明明白》，见苏珊·哈克、陈波等编译《意义、谬误与行动》，东方出版社。

Gross, Neil. 2010.“Charles Tilly and American Pragmatism. ” The American Sociologist 41（4）: 337–57.

Camic, Charles.1986.“The Matter of Habit.”American Journal of Sociology 91: 1039-1087.

皮埃尔，布迪厄，2012，《理论感》，蒋梓骅译，译林出版社，第1-9章。

皮耶，布赫迪厄，2012，《田野中的哲学工作》、《从规则到战略》、《法典化》，见皮耶，布赫迪厄，《所述之言》，陈逸淳译，台北：麦田。

Brubaker, Rogers. 1985. “Rethinking Classical Theory: The Sociological Vision of Pierre Bourdieu.” Theory and Society 14: 745-775.

Shusterman，Richard .1999.“Bourdieu and Anglo-American Philosophy.” In Richard Shusterman, Richard（eds.）Bourdieu ：A Critical Reader (Pp14-28).Wiley-Blackwell

Aboulafia,Mitchell. 1999.“A (neo) American inParis: Bourdieu, Mead, and Pragmatism.”In Richard Shusterman, Richard（eds.）Bourdieu ：A Critical Reader (Pp153-174). Wiley-Blackwell

Croce, Mariano. 2015. “The Habitus and the Critique of the Present.” Sociological Theory 33(4):327–346.

Timmermans, Stefan, and Iddo Tavory. 2020.“RacistEncounters: A Pragmatist Semiotic Analysis of Interaction.” Sociological Theory 38(4):295-317.

十七、行动理论，结构主义与适用主义（2）

Lizardo, Omar. 2004. “The cognitive origins of Bourdieu's habitus.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34(4):375-401.

Ignatow, Gabe. 2007. "Theories of embodied knowledge: new directions for cultural and cognitive sociology?."Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37(2), 115-135.

Vaisey, Stephen. 2009, "Motivation and Justification: A Dual‐Process Model of Culture in Action." American Journal of Sociology 114: 1675–1715.

Lizardo, Omar and Michael Strand. 2010.”Skills, Toolkits, Contexts and Institutions: Clarifying the Relationship between Different Approaches to Cognition in Cultural Sociology. ”Poetics 38: 205–28.

Lizardo, O. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu as a post-cultural theorist. Cultural Sociology 5(1), 25-44.

Strand Michael and Omar Lizardo. 2015.“Beyond World Images: Belief as Embodied Action in the World.” Sociological Theory 33(1):44-70.

Strand, Michael and Omar Lizardo. 2017. “The Hysteresis Effect: Theorizing Mismatch in Action.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 47 (2): 164–94.

Lizardo, Omar. 2017. “Improving Cultural Analysis: Considering Personal Culture in its Declarative and Nondeclarative Modes.” American Sociological Review 82(1):88–115.

Lahire, Bernard. 2003. “From the Habitus to and Individual Heritage of Dispositions. Towards a Sociology at the Level of the Individual.” Poetics 31:329-55.

Lahire, Bernard. 2011.The Plural Actor . New York: Polity Press

十八、韦伯的理性化文化与新制度主义

Scaff, Lawrence. 2000. “Weber on the Cultural Situation of the Modern Age.” In Stephen Turner (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Weber(Pp. 99-116). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press

保罗·迪马吉奥、沃尔特·鲍威尔，2008，《组织剖析的新制度主义》，姚伟译，上海：上海人民出版社。

Krücken, Georgand Drori, Gili S. 2010. World Society:The Writings of John W. Meyer ,Oxford :Oxford University Press.

帕特丽夏·H.桑顿、威廉·奥卡西奥、龙思博，2020，《制度逻辑：制度如何塑造人和组织》，汪少卿、杜运周、翟慎霄、张容榕译，杭州: 浙江大学出版社。

十九、回到经典：《韦伯措施论文集》

马克斯·韦伯，2013，《在“文化科学的逻辑”这个范畴的一些批判性的研讨》、《社会科学的与社会政策的学问之“客观性”》，《韦伯措施论文集》，张旺山译，台北：联经出版社。

马克斯·韦伯，2021，《社会科学与社会政策认识的“客观性”》，见《学术与政治》，阎克文译，上海：上海人民出版社。

马克斯·韦伯，2021，《社会科学的基本概念》，见《社会科学的基本概念 经济行动与社会团体》，康乐、简惠美译，上海：上海三联书店。选读行动部分

马克斯·韦伯，2019，《社会科学的基本术语》，见《经济与社会（第一卷）》，阎克文译，上海：上海人民出版社。

Weber, Max. 2012. Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings . Routledge.

Weber, Max. 2019.Economy and Society: A New Translation ,Harvard University Press.

选读：

Bruun, Hans Henrik Bruun.2007.Science, Values and Politics in Max Weber's Methodology. Ashgate Pub Co

Hirschman, Daniel andIsaac Ariail Reed. “Formation Stories and Causality in Sociology”， Sociological Theory 32(4): 259- 282

格奥尔格·G. 伊格尔斯，2021，《德国的历史观》，彭刚、顾杭译，北京: 商务印书馆。

二十、解释与了解（一）

朱迪亚·珀尔、达纳·麦肯齐，2019，《因果关系之梯》，见《为什么：关于因果关系的新科学》，江生、于华译，北京: 中信出版集团股份有限公司。

加里·金、罗伯特·基欧汉、悉尼·维巴，2014，《社会科学中的“科学”》，见《社会科学中的研讨设计》，陈硕，上海: 格致出版社。

加里·格尔茨、詹姆斯·马奥尼，2016，《第一部分：因果模型与推断》，见《两种传承》，刘军译，上海: 格致出版社。

Gorski, Philip S. 2009. “Social ‘Mechanisms’And Comparative-Historical Sociology: A Critical Realist Proposal” In Peter Hedstrm and Bjrn Wittrock（eds.) Frontiers of Sociology （Pp147-194）,Leiden Boston：Brill.

Woodward, James and Lauren Ross, “Scientific Explanation”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

Galavotti, Maria Carla, "Wesley Salmon", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.).

Chakravartty, Anjan, “Scientific Realism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

选读：

珍妮特.M.博克斯—斯蒂芬斯迈埃尔等编，2021，《牛津政治学研讨措施手册》，臧雷振、傅琼译，北京：人民出版社。

Judea Pearl、Madelyn Glymour、Nicholas P.Jewell，2020，《统计因果推理入门》，杨矫云、安定、李廉译，北京: 高等教育出版社。

Morgan, Stephen L. 2013.Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research .New York: Springer.

Morgan, Stephen L and Christopher Winship. 2014. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference . Cambridge University Press.

Huntington-Klein，Nick. 2021.The Effect ：An Introduction to Research Design and Causality . Routledge.

Gilbert, Margaret. 1989. On Social Facts . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Abbott, Andrew.1998. “The causal devolution.” Sociological Methods and Research 27 (2): 148–181

Andrew, Abbott. 1988. “Transcending General Linear Reality.” Sociological Theory 6: 169-186.

Abend, Gabriel, Caitlin Petre and Michael Sauder. 2013. “Styles of Causal Thought: An Empirical Investigation.” American Journal of Sociology 119(3): 602-654.

Reiss, Julian. 2009. “Causation in the Social Sciences: Evidence, Inference, and Purpose.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39(1): 20–40.

二十一、解释与了解（二）

克利福德·格尔茨，2012，《深描说：迈向文化的解释理论》，见《文化的解释》，韩莉译，南京：译林出版社。

Taylor, Charles. 1985. “Interpretation and the sciences of man.” In Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2 , edited by Charles Taylor. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press

Reed, Isaac. 2008. “Justifying Sociological Knowledge: From Realism to Interpretation.” Sociological Theory 26 (2): 101–29.

Reed, Isaac A. 2016，“What is Interpretive Explanation in Sociohistorical Analysis?” In Georgia Warnke(eds.) Inheriting Gadamer: New Directions in Philosophical Hermeneutics . Edinburgh University Press.

Gross, Neil. 2009.“A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review 74(3):358-379.

Tavory, Iddo and Stefan Timmermans. 2013. “A Pragmatist Approach to Causality in Ethnography.” American Journal of Sociology 119(3): 682-714.

Iddo Tavory and Stefan Timmermans. 2018. “Mechanisms” In Coli Jerolmack and Sheamus Khan (eds.),Approaches to Ethnography. Analysis and Representation in Participant Observation . Oxford: Oxford University Press

Knight, Carly R andIsaac A.Reed. 2019. “Meaning and Modularity: The Multivalence of ‘Mechanism’ in Sociological Explanation.” Sociological Theory 37(3): 234-256.

选读

理查德·J.伯恩斯坦，2008，《社会政管理论的重构》，黄瑞祺译，南京：译林出版社。

冯·赖特，2016，《解释与了解》，张留华译，杭州：浙江大学出版社。

Reed, Isaac A. 2011. Interpretation And SocialKnowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Zammito, John H.2004.A Nice Derangement of Epistemes:Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Steinmetz, George. The politics of method in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others, politics, history, and culture . Durham: Duke University Press

二十二、终章世界的意义图景，再消费、不肯定性与风险感知、认同、极化

陈忠，2018，《乡村基础教育的“放弃”现象研讨》，见《北大清华人大社会学硕士论文选编（2018）》，储卉娟、卢晖临、晋军、李丁编，北京：中国展开出版社。

陈莹骄，2019，《洞察、志向与突围：关于乡村教育的质性研讨》，见《北大清华人大社会学硕士论文选编（2019）》，储卉娟、卢晖临、晋军、李丁编，北京：中国展开出版社。

克利福德·格尔茨，2012，《文化的解释》，韩莉译，南京：译林出版社。

阿莉·拉塞尔·霍赫希尔德，2020，《故乡的陌生人：美国激进派的愤恨与哀痛》，夏凡译，北京: 社会科学文献出版社

保罗·威利斯，2022，《学做工：工人阶级子弟为何继承父业（45周年留念版）》，秘舒、凌旻华译，南京: 译林出版社。

Lareau, Annette. 2015. “Cultural Knowledge and Social Inequality.” American Sociological Review 80(1):1–27.

乔治·莱考夫、马克· 约翰逊，2015，《我们赖以生存的隐喻》，何文忠译，杭州：浙江大学出版社。

瑞秋·谢尔曼，2022，《不安之街：财富的焦虑》，黄炎宁译，上海: 华东师范大学出版社。

玛丽·道格拉斯，2020，《洁净与风险》，黄剑波、柳博赟、卢忱译，北京：商务印书馆。

玛丽·道格拉斯，2022，《风险的接受》，熊畅译，上海：华东师范大学出版社。

Mary Douglas. 1986. How Institutions Think . Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

Kahan, Dan, Hank Jenkins-Smith and Donald Braman. 2011. “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus.” Journal of Risk Research 14(2): 147-74

John Tulloch，2008，“Culture and Risk” Pp138-167，In Zinn, Jens O. （ed）Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty ：An Introduction ，Malden，Wiley-Blackwell

Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1999. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology . Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.

Reed, Isaac Ariail. 2015, “Deep Culture in Action: Resignification, Synecdoche, and Metanarrative in the Moral Panic of the Salem Witch Trials. ”Theory and Society 44: 65–94.

Polletta, Francesca and Jessica Callahan. 2019. ‘Deep Stories, Nostalgia Narratives and Fake News: Storytelling in the Trump Era.” In Jason Mast and Jeffrey Alexander(eds.),Politics of Meaning/Meaning of Politics: Cultual sociology in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election . Berlin: Springer.

Reed, Isaac Ariail,Power in Modernity: Agency relations and the creative destruction of the King’s Two Bodies . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2020.

Hahl, Oliver, Minjae Kim and Ezra Zuckerman Sivan. 2018. “The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue: Proclaiming the Deeper Truth about Political Illegitimacy.” American Sociological Review 83(1): 1-33

Mason, Liliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became our Identity . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brubaker, Rogers and Frederick Cooper. 2000. “Beyond ‘Identity.’” Theory and Society 29:1–47.

Brubaker, Rogers, Mara Loveman, and Peter Stamatov. 2004. “Ethnicity as Cognition.” Theory and Society 33(1):33-64.

Abrams, Dominic and Michael Hogg. 2010. “Social Identity and Self Categorization.” Pp. 179-93 In John Dovidio, Miles Hewstone, Peter Glick and Victoria Esses (eds.) Sage Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination . Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Deaux, Kay and Daniela Martin. 2003. “Interpersonal Networks and Social Categories: Specifying Levels of Context in Identity Processes.”Social Psychology Quarterly 66(3): 101-17.

Markus, Hazel Rose and Shinobu Kitayama. 2010. “Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution.” Perspectives on Psychological Scienc e 5（4）: 420-30.

Iyengar, Shanto. 2012. “Affect, not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405-31.

Cerulo, Karen A. 2018. “Scents and Sensibility: Olfaction, Sense-Making, and MeaningAttribution.” American Sociological Review 83(2): 361-389.

Zelizer, Viviana. 2011. Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy . Princeton University Press.